Order: Shri S.S Garg, Judicial Member The present appeal is directed against the impugned order dated 27.10.2008 passed by the Commissioner (A) wherein the Commissioner (A) has allowed the appeal partially. Briefly the facts of the present case are that during the scrutiny of financial records of the appellant by the anti-evasion wing of service…

Order: Shri S.S Garg, Judicial Member  The appellants have filed these 11 appeals against the impugned order dated 7.12.2016 and 10.5.2016 passed by the Commissioner (A) whereby the Commissioner (A) has upheld the Orders-in-Original and rejected the appeals of the appellant. The issue in all the 11 appeals is common and therefore, all the 11…

Order: Mr. Ashok Jindal, Member (Judicial)The Revenue is in appeal against the impugned order. The brief facts of the case are that the respondent is an exporter of services and to export the services, the respondent availed services of Rent a Cab, Asset Insurance, Health Insurance and Professional Indemnity Insurance as input service availed cenvat…

Order: Mr. Ashok Jindal, Member (Judicial) The appellant is in appeal against the impugned order wherein the demand of service tax has been confirmed on renting of immovable property service for renting out various properties namely shops, open space etc. for the period 01.06.2007 to 31.10.2010 by invoking extended period of limitation. As the show…

Order: Mr. Ashok Jindal, Member (Judicial) The appellant is in appeal against the impugned order wherein the refund claim has been rejected on the ground of time barred. The facts of the case are that the appellant is an exporter of services for providing output service and the appellant availed cenvat credit on certain services…

Order: Dr. D.M. Misra, Member (Judicial) Heard both sides. This  appeal is filed against the Order-in- Appeal No. VAP-EXCUS-000-APP  180-181-14-15 dated 25.7.2014 passed by the Commissioner (Appeals), Central Excise, Customs & Service Tax, Vapi.    The appellant in the present case disputes the imposition of penalty under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. Ld….

Order: Mr. Ashok Jindal, Member (Judicial) Both sides are in appeal against the impugned order-in-original. The facts of the case are that assessee-appellant is registered with the service tax department under the category of GTA/IPR/Consulting Engineering services and paying service tax thereon and they are also engaged in the manufacturing of struts, shock absorbers, front…

Order: Dr. D.M. Misra, Member (Judicial) Heard both sides. This appeal is filed against the Order-in-Original No. STC/19/Commr /Ahd/2011 dted 6.5.2011 passed by the Commissioner, Central Excise ,Ahmedabad.   Proceeding was initiated against the appellant for recovery of service tax for providing taxable service  under the category of  consulting engineering service during the period 2005-06…

Order: Dr. D.M. Misra, Member (Judicial) Heard both sides.  This appeal is filed against the Order-in-Appeal No. BC/165/Surat II/2011 dated 11.7.2011 passed by the Commissioner (Appeals), Central Excise, & Customs, Surat. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that the appellants are engaged in providing the taxable service through their clients and failed to…

Order: Shri P.K.Choudhary, Member (Judicial) None appeared on behalf of the appellant despite Notice. An application for adjournment has been filed by the appellant. Heard the ld.AR for the Revenue. As the issue lies in a narrow compass, I take up the appeal for disposal with the consent of ld.AR for the Revenue and in…

Page 1 of 1091 2 3 109
×
Talk to legalpundits now +91 7666653425 & 022 - 49156000