Commercial Law

Year

Document Types

Ministries

Industries

States

Supreme Court / High Courts

Tribunals
Records found : 5425 of 5425
Department of Commerce Notification No:S.O. 4207(E) [F.No.F.1/152/2008-SEZ] (26-Dec-2016) Rescinds the Notification Number S.O. 2175(E) dated 25th August, 2009 except as respects things done or omitted to be one before such rescission
Set up a sector specific Special Economic Zone for Agro and Agro based products sector at Village-Umariya, Tehsil-Shahpura, District-Jabalpur, in the State of Madhya Pradesh  26-Jan-2017 read more
Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) (Amendment) Act, 2016 (12-Jan-2017)
Amend the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963  12-Jan-2017 read more
DGFT Public Notice No.54/(2015-2020) [No.01/93/180/09/AM-16/PC-2 (B)] (11-Jan-2017) Amendment in Chapter 2 of the Handbook of Procedure (2015-20)
Amends para 2.14(A) of the Handbook of Procedure (2015-20) as well as the provision in the Public Notice No.58 dated 1.2.2016 and Appendix 2K of FTP(2015-20)  11-Jan-2017 read more
Maharashtra Industries, Energy and Labour Department Corrigendum No:Aviyo-2015/Para No.197/Urja-5 (11-Jan-2017) Corrigendum
Corrigendum to Implement integrated power development scheme in Maharashtra State  11-Jan-2017 read more
Ministry of Coal Notification No: S.O. 121(E) [F.No.43015/27/2016-PRIW-I] (11-Jan-2017) Notice of its intention to prospect for coal from the land described in Schedule
Central Government that coal is likely to be obtained from the land in the locality described in the Schedule annexed hereto  11-Jan-2017 read more
Department of Commerce Notification No: F.No.15/23/2016-DGAD (10-Jan-2017) Initiation of Sunset Review of Antidumping Duty on import of Saccharin from China PR
Initiated an antidumping investigation into alleged dumping of Saccharin from China PR and consequent injury to the domestic industry  10-Jan-2017 read more
Khadi Mark (Amendment) Regulations, 2017 (10-Jan-2017)
Regulations to amend the Khadi Mark Regulations, 2013  10-Jan-2017 read more
1. M/s. BrahMos Aerospace Private Limited, 2. M/s. BrahMos Aerospaceig Private Limited Branch at DRDL (PJ-10) VS 1. The State of Maharashtra, 2. State of Andhra Pradesh Rep. By its Principal Secretary Revenue Department, 3. State of Telangana represented by the Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, 4. The Commissioner of Sales Tax, 5. The Assistant Commissioner of Sales tax
The Bombay High Court noted that there is a fundamental error, in the understanding of the assessing officer, of the provisions of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. The instant Court had to elaborately analyse the provisions only for clearing certain doubts of the authorities, particularly in the State of Maharashtra. They have failed to notice the salient features of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. The understanding of the assessing officer that it is the movement of finished goods, which would be the determining and conclusive factor is legally flawed. It is untenable, inasmuch as the presumption that all the decided cases speak about and dealt with movement of finished goods from one State to another and not semi finished goods. It is this erroneous presumption that has resulted in a conclusion completely vitiated in law. There is non application of mind to very crucial and relevant factors, which govern the applicability of the Central Sales Tax Act to the inter- State trade and commerce. As such, the writ petition succeeded.  10-Jan-2017 read more
1. Vaishnav Transformer, 2. Vijay Kumar Jain, Proprietor Purity Cables VS Union of India & Anr
The Delhi High Court held that a rate contract need not be for supply of an unlimited quantity. A seller may have a limited supply capability or may agree to offer a limited quantity at a given price. Restricting the rate contract to only those sellers who can supply unlimited quantity would disentitle the departments from purchasing the item economically from a seller who is able to supply, only a limited quantity, at a lower rate. Thus, there can be situations, under a rate contract, where for the same item, there are multiple rates. This would not prejudice the departments because the departments would always be at liberty to place orders on the seller who is offering the lowest price for the item. As such, the writ petition was dismissed.  10-Jan-2017 read more
Goa Industrial Development Corporation Transfer and Sub-Lease (First Amendment) Regulations, 2016 (21-Dec-2016)
In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) of section 51 read with sub-section (2) of section 29 of the Goa Industrial Development Act, 1965  09-Jan-2017 read more
Ministry of Commerce and Industry Press Release (09-Jan-2017) Meeting of the Commerce and Industry Minister with Incubators and Accelerators
Smt. Nirmala Sitharaman, held a meeting with various incubators and accelerators to gather feedback, hear their concerns and address key challenges faced by them in the Startup ecosystem  09-Jan-2017 read more
Ministry of Commerce and Industry Press Release (09-Jan-2017) Bilateral Meeting between Commerce and Industry Minister and H.E. Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry, Japan
Smt. Nirmala Sitharaman welcomed the Japanese delegation led by H.E. Hiroshige Seko, Minister, Ministry of Economy Trade and Industry (METI), Japan and recalled that the recent visit of Hon’ble Prime Minister of India to Japan in November, 2016 was very successful in further strengthening the partnership between the two countries  09-Jan-2017 read more
Bihar State Street Vendors (Protection of livelihood and regulation of trade) (Repeal) Act, 2016 (06-Jan-2017)
An Act to repeal the Bihar State Street Vendors (Protection of livelihood and regulation of trade) Act, 2012  06-Jan-2017 read more
Ask the Pundits! +91-76666 53425 or email us @ sales@legalpundits.com